DEV Community

Cover image for Has anyone actually shipped a free offline mobile LLM?
ujja
ujja

Posted on

Has anyone actually shipped a free offline mobile LLM?

Offline, free, lightweight mobile LLM. Is it actually real?

I’m genuinely curious. Has anyone shipped an offline, free, lightweight mobile LLM, especially for a speech-based app?

I’ve tried building an on-device AI assistant, and the reality is messy:

  • Models are still huge
  • Mobile tooling is painful (Android + JNI + assets)
  • Latency and memory constraints are real
  • “Lightweight” feels like a myth unless you compromise hard

So I’m asking the community:

Is there a truly usable offline (and free of cost) LLM for mobile right now?

If yes, what did you use and how did you ship it?

If no, what’s the closest thing you’ve tried?

Top comments (7)

Collapse
 
codingpanel profile image
Coding Panel

“Yep — offline mobile LLMs exist, but you usually have to compromise on size, speed, or accuracy. Quantized LLaMA/GGUF models are the closest I’ve seen work on-device.”

Collapse
 
nube_colectiva_nc profile image
Nube Colectiva

I checked it too. We hope it improves. It would be helpful.

Collapse
 
chingiiiix profile image
Aditya N Bhatt

yes, i have used gemma 3 model and it works flawlessly.

Collapse
 
art_light profile image
Art light

Yes — there are usable offline, free, lightweight mobile LLMs in the wild (e.g., running quantized LLaMA, Mistral 7B, or GGML-based variants on device), but getting them performant for speech without significant compromises in latency/accuracy is still nontrivial and depends heavily on aggressive quantization and model choice.

Most shipped examples lean on frameworks like GGML/llama.cpp with 4-bit quantization or similar, and integrate small local encoders/decoders for speech; if you need higher accuracy or larger context, you still need to accept tradeoffs or offload to the cloud.

Collapse
 
ujja profile image
ujja • Edited

Totally agree. This is pretty much why I asked the question.

I actually tried shipping this for a speech first mobile app and wrote up the whole journey in an earlier post called Offline AI on Mobile: Tackling Whisper, LLMs, and Size Roadblocks.

What I found in practice:

  • Whisper on device works really well
  • The moment you add an LLM, things get messy fast
  • Even smaller models hit Android and iOS limits around assets, memory, and native bridging
  • Quantization helps, but conversational UX takes a hit pretty quickly

So yeah, it is real, but only if you accept very tight constraints around context, speed, or response quality. Anything that feels like a smooth assistant still involves pretty visible trade offs.

Collapse
 
simplewbs profile image
SimpleWBS

Yes, there are several small LLMs perfect for running locally on your phone with solid performance.

Top Picks

These models (under 4B params) fit in 4-8GB RAM and hit 5-15 tokens/sec on modern devices like recent Pixels or iPhones.

Model Size Best For
Gemma 2B ~1.4GB Chat, quick responses
Phi-3 Mini ~2.3GB Reasoning, code snippets
TinyLlama ~1.7GB General tasks, efficient

How to Run

Grab MLC LLM or PocketPal from app stores, download quantized GGUF versions from Hugging Face, and load 'em up—no cloud needed. Start small to test speed!

Collapse
 
ujja profile image
ujja • Edited

Yep, those are exactly the models I tested.

They are impressive on their own, but moving from a chat demo to an offline speech based app is where the cracks show. I documented the full attempt here if you are interested: Offline AI on Mobile: Tackling Whisper, LLMs, and Size Roadblocks.

A few things that caught me out:

  • Running Whisper and phi-mini together pushes memory harder than expected
  • Android asset handling gets painful fast once models get big
  • JNI plus llama.cpp works in theory, but debugging it is not fun
  • Tokens per second was not the main issue, latency spikes were

Tools like MLC LLM and PocketPal definitely help, but shipping this inside a real app still meant choosing between speed, size, or quality. Never all three.

Feels like we are close, just not quite there yet for offline, speech first experiences.