🛡️ Project Warden: The End of "Innocent" Security in AWS
In the early days of cloud engineering, there was a sense of Innocent Trust. We believed that if a Terraform plan was applied correctly, the infrastructure was "safe." We treated security as a destination—a state we reached once and then moved on to the next feature.
But as any SRE or SecOps professional will tell you, the "rest period" is over. We now live in the era of Configuration Drift.
Whether it’s a "quick fix" by a developer in the console or an overlooked IAM policy, your private S3 buckets are always one mutation away from becoming public liabilities. Today, I’m sharing the framework I use to combat this: Project Warden.
The Philosophy: Why "Warden"?
Traditional security is often passive. You run a scan once a week, get a 400-page PDF, and spend the next month manually fixing buckets.
Project Warden is active. It is an autonomous sentinel that treats every AWS region as a dynamic environment that must be constantly coerced back into a "Private" gold standard. It shifts the narrative from detection to enforced idempotency.
🏛️ The Compliance Backbone (NCSC & NCA)
We don't just secure for the sake of it; we secure to meet rigorous global standards. By using an automated "Heartbeat" (via GitHub Actions), this project maps directly to:
- NCSC CAF (Objective B): Protecting against attacks by enforcing rigid identity and access controls.
- NCA ECC-1 (2-4-1): Ensuring continuous data protection through technical enforcement rather than "best effort" policies.
🛠️ The Code: Regional S3 Warden
The heart of the Warden is a single, idempotent Ansible playbook. It doesn't care why a bucket became public; it only cares that it stops being public.
- name: "Regional S3 Warden (Heartbeat Sweep)"
hosts: localhost
connection: local
tasks:
- name: "Step 1: Regional Discovery"
amazon.aws.s3_bucket_info:
region: "{{ target_region }}"
register: bucket_list
- name: "Step 2: The Iron Fist (Enforcement)"
amazon.aws.s3_bucket:
name: "{{ item.name }}"
region: "{{ target_region }}"
public_access:
block_public_acls: true
block_public_policy: true
ignore_public_acls: true
restrict_public_buckets: true
state: present
loop: "{{ bucket_list.buckets }}"
register: sweep_results
- name: "Step 3: Incident Capture"
set_fact:
remediated_buckets: "{{ sweep_results.results | selectattr('changed', 'equalto', true) | map(attribute='item.name') | list }}"
- name: "Step 4: Silent Vigilance or Urgent Alert"
community.general.mail:
# ... SMTP Config ...
subject: "REMEDIATED: Security Drift Found in {{ target_region }}"
body: "{{ lookup('template', 'templates/s3_report.html.j2') }}"
when: remediated_buckets | length > 0
Why This Matters
- Idempotency is King: If the bucket is already secure, Ansible does nothing. This reduces API noise and prevents unnecessary logs.
- The 5-Minute Window: By running this on a GitHub Actions schedule, the maximum "Innocence Window" (the time a bucket stays public) is only 300 seconds.
- Signal Over Noise: You only get an email when the Warden actually has to fight. If your inbox is empty, your region is safe.
Moving Forward
The "End of Innocence" doesn't mean we live in fear. It means we build smarter, more aggressive systems. We stop being the firemen and start building the automatic sprinkler systems.
Project Repo: https://github.com/neamanahmed/ncs3
What are you using to fight Configuration Drift in your stack? Let’s discuss in the comments.
Top comments (2)
Interested to understand why this approach was chosen over using AWS Config?
Great question, Faye. While AWS Config is a robust native service, Project Warden was architected with three strategic advantages in mind:
Cloud Agnostic Foundations: By using Ansible for remediation, we’ve built a logic that is provider-agnostic. The 'Warden' pattern can be ported to Azure Blobs or GCP Buckets with minimal refactoring. In a multi-cloud reality, having a unified governance language (Ansible) is often more sustainable than managing fragmented, native-only tools.
Deterministic Remediation (Idempotency): AWS Config and Lambda can sometimes lead to complex 'if-this-then-that' chains. Ansible’s idempotent nature means we define the desired state directly. We aren't just reacting to a change; we are constantly enforcing a standard, which simplifies the audit trail for NCSC CAF and NCA ECC-1 requirements.
Cost & Control: At high scale, the 'per-recorder' cost of Config rules can escalate. Project Warden runs on a 'Heartbeat' schedule via GitHub Actions, providing a predictable, fixed-cost model for regional governance without the overhead of native service dependencies.
It’s really about shifting from 'Native Monitoring' to 'Global Enforcement'.