Reviewing legacy code is often treated like a chore, but it’s actually a sign of success. If a codebase lives long enough to become "legacy," it means the product survived. As we navigate the layers of old logic to implement new features, our most excellent tool isn't a debugger—it’s empathy.
1. Evolution is Mandatory
Applications are living organisms. Feature requests, scaling needs, and market shifts mean that code which was perfect two years ago might be a bottleneck today. Reviewing legacy code isn’t an "extra" task; it is a fundamental part of the development lifecycle. When we revisit old features, we aren't just looking at "old stuff"—we are observing how the application has grown and where it needs to go next.
2. You Don’t Have the Full Picture
It is easy to be a critic with the benefit of hindsight. When you encounter a "hacky" solution, remember that you are looking at the result, not the process.
- The Invisible Constraints: That "weird" logic might have been a hotfix for a critical production bug at 3:00 AM.
- The Moving Target: The requirements might have changed many times during development.
- The Human Element: The team member might have been a newbie and learning on the fly, or a senior dev juggling five different projects under a tight deadline.
3. The Prime Directive: Assume Excellence
Regardless of what you discover in the files, operate under the belief that the person who wrote that code did the best job they could. They worked with the information they had, the skills they possessed at the time, and the specific tools available to them.
When you assume the previous developer(s) did their best, your mindset shifts from blame to curiosity. Instead of asking, "Why did they do this so poorly?" you start asking, "What problem were they trying to solve that necessitated this approach?"
4. Git Blame is for Context, Not Conflict
The git blame command has an unfortunate name, but it shouldn't be used to find a target. Instead, use it as a bridge to tribal knowledge.
- Identify Resources: Check if the author still works at the company. If they do, reach out with curiosity: "Hey, I'm working on the checkout logic you touched last year—do you remember if there was a specific reason we handled it this way?"
- Find the "Why": Use the commit history to find the original Pull Request. Often, the discussion in that PR contains the specific business logic that explains the implementation.
- Respect the Timeline: Seeing that a piece of code hasn't been touched in years tells you it’s stable, even if it’s not "pretty."
5. Move Forward with an Open Mind
The goal of a code review is improvement, not a trial. Once you understand the "why" behind the legacy logic, focus your energy on the "how" of the future.
- Understand first, refactor second: Never delete what you don't fully understand.
- Leave it better than you found it: You don't have to rewrite the whole module, function. You can make small, incremental cleanups to make it easier for the next developer to improve the code.
- Document the context: When you update the code, leave a comment explaining why the change was made so the next person doesn't have to guess.
Top comments (0)